![]() ![]() I call it the LEGO system of evolution for lack of a better term. I personally think that a different system is responsible. I’m okay with the questioning and I can see some flaws in the theory of evolution. The linked article posits the notion, “The extravagant splendor of the animal kingdom can’t be explained by natural selection alone - so how did it come to be?” One person might think a particular landscape is the most incredible thing they have ever seen but it is more than likely that the majority will also think that landscape is beautiful, just not to that degree. I rather think that it is the extent of beauty that is in the eye of the beholder. ![]() There is the saying, “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” and that’s true to an extent. “For decades, natural selection - the fact that creatures with the most advantageous traits have the best chance of surviving and multiplying - has been considered the unequivocal centerpiece of evolutionary theory.” Now it seems as if there are a few scientists toying with an old idea that Darwin had, an idea about beauty. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |